4.4 Review

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: A systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 226, Issue 1, Pages 37-47

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.013

Keywords

Disparities; Breast reconstruction; Social determinants of health; Inequality

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review evaluates racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African American women after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The study found that breast reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white women and 38.5% in African American women. Implicit bias, communication barriers, and infrastructure were identified as the most promising strategies to achieve equitable access to breast reconstruction for African American women.
Background: This systematic review assesses racial disparities for African American (AA) women in breast reconstruction following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.Methods: Four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and September 2021.Results: Out of 917 screened articles, 61 were included. The most common metrics were breast reconstruction rates (57.4%) and clinical outcomes (14.8%). Pooled reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white and 38.5% in AA women. 95.1% of studies found disparities in breast reconstruction rates. The greatest influencers on reconstruction rates were individual interactions in the healthcare system (54%), sociocultural environment (39%), behavioral factors (31%), and community interactions with the healthcare system (36%).Conclusion: Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist. Focusing on implicit bias, communication barriers and infrastructure are the most promising strategies to create equitable access to breast reconstruction for AA women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available