4.7 Article

Pathogen exposure misclassification can bias association signals in GWAS of infectious diseases when using population-based common control subjects

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 336-348

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.12.013

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide association studies have been used to identify host genetic factors for various phenotypes, including infectious diseases. The use of population-based common control subjects is a valuable resource to increase sample sizes, but the choice of control subjects is especially important for infectious diseases due to potential selection bias.
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been performed to identify host genetic factors for a range of phenotypes, including for infectious diseases. The use of population-based common control subjects from biobanks and extensive consortia is a valuable resource to increase sample sizes in the identification of associated loci with minimal additional expense. Non-differential misclassification of the outcome has been reported when the control subjects are not well characterized, which often attenuates the true effect size. However, for infectious diseases the comparison of affected subjects to population-based common control subjects regardless of pathogen exposure can also result in selection bias. Through simulated comparisons of pathogen-exposed cases and population-based common control subjects, we demonstrate that not accounting for pathogen exposure can result in biased effect estimates and spurious genome-wide significant signals. Further, the observed association can be distorted depending upon strength of the association between a locus and pathogen exposure and the prevalence of pathogen exposure. We also used a real data example from the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genetic consortium comparing HCV spontaneous clearance to persistent infection with both well-characterized control subjects and population-based common control subjects from the UK Biobank. We find biased effect estimates for known HCV clearance-associated loci and potentially spurious HCV clearance associations. These findings suggest that the choice of control subjects is especially impor-tant for infectious diseases or outcomes that are conditional upon environmental exposures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available