4.4 Article

Risk Factors for Incident Coronary Artery Calcium in Younger (Age 32 to 45 Years) Versus Intermediate (46 to 64 Years) Versus Older (65 to 84 Years) Persons

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 14-21

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Bethesda, Maryland) [N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169, R01 HL071739]
  2. National Center for Research Resources (Bethesda, Maryland) [UL1-TR-000040, UL1 TR 001079, UL1-RR025005]
  3. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (Washington, District of Columbia) (EPA) [RD831697, RD-83830001]
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Bethesda, Maryland)
  5. University of Alabama at Birmingham, (Birmingham, Alabama) [HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800007I]
  6. Northwestern University, (Evanston, Illinois) [HHSN268201800003I]
  7. University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, Minnesota) [HHSN268201800006I]
  8. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute (Rockville, Maryland) [HHSN268201800004I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prognostic value of traditional atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors may decrease with age, and they are more strongly associated with incident coronary artery calcium (CAC) in young adults compared to older adults.
The prognostic value of traditional atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors may decrease with age. We sought to determine whether the association between traditional ASCVD risk factors and incident coronary artery calcium (CAC) differs for younger versus older persons. We included 5,108 participants with baseline CAC = 0. Repeat CAC scoring occurred over 3 to 11 years of follow-up. Multivariable Cox propor-tional hazards regression assessed the association between traditional risk factors and inci-dent CAC in young (32 to 45 years), middle-aged (46 to 64 years), and older adults (65 to 84 years). A total of 61% of the participants were women and 37% were Black. The pro-portion with incident CAC ranged from 22% among young adults, 34% for middle-aged adults, and 45% for older adults. In young adults, traditional risk factors were signifi-cantly associated with incident CAC except for diastolic blood pressure and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, whereas only total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol >= 3.5 (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with incident CAC in older persons. Non-HDL cho-lesterol (p = 0.02) was more strongly associated with incident CAC in young (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.31) and middle aged (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.23) compared to older adults (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.23). When added to demographics, traditional risk factors provided a greater C-statistic improvement for inci-dent CAC prediction in young (0.752, +0.070, p <0.001) versus middle-aged (0.645, +0.054, p <0.001) and older adults (0.597,+0.025, p = 0.08). In conclusion, traditional risk factors more strongly predict incident CAC in young compared to older adults, underlining the importance of primordial prevention through middle age while identifying the challenges of ASCVD risk assessment in older persons. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2022;184:14-21)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available