4.5 Article

Space-Time Characterization of Ship Airwakes

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 681-697

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J062093

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The turbulent airwakes generated by a typical navy frigate were investigated using a low-speed wind tunnel. High-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry was performed at various spanwise planes over the flight deck. The results revealed the shedding of turbulent structures from the funnel and superstructure edges, as well as the three-dimensional bistable behavior of the flow recirculation region behind the superstructure. Additionally, a pair of vortices near the stern exhibited low-frequency bistable dynamics, with the bistable flow recirculation region influencing the low-frequency behavior of other major flow features.
The turbulent airwakes produced by a generic navy frigate (Simple Frigate Ship 2) was investigated in a low-speed wind tunnel. The frigate model was subjected to a headwind and immersed in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. High-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) was performed at six different spanwise planes over the flight deck. A spatio-temporal analysis of the PIV airwake measurements was conducted by applying the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) to individual frequency bands of the airwake. Physical interpretations of the leading POD modes were substantiated by other complementary analyses. In particular, it was discovered that turbulent structures were shed from the funnel and superstructure edges. The flow recirculation region behind the superstructure exhibited a strongly three-dimensional bistable behavior. A pair of vortices near the stern also demonstrated low-frequency bistable dynamics. Notably, the bistable flow recirculation region appeared to influence or interact with the low-frequency behavior of the other major flow features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available