4.7 Editorial Material

Three key areas in progressing delirium practice and knowledge: recognition and relief of distress, new directions in delirium epidemiology and developing better research assessments

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 51, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac271

Keywords

delirium; dementia; distress; neuropsychology; epidemiology

Funding

  1. Dunhill Medical Trust [RPGF1902\147]
  2. Wellcome Trust through a fellowship award [WT107467]
  3. Medical Research Council Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at University College London [MC_UU_00019/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delirium presents significant challenges and affects a large proportion of older hospitalized adults. The care for delirium is generally poor, but there have been recent policy advances and increased research output. This article highlights three areas that have the potential to transform delirium practice and knowledge. These areas include addressing the distress caused by delirium, advancing delirium epidemiology research, and improving the assessment of delirium severity. There is still progress to be made, but innovation in these areas can lead to exciting possibilities in enhancing patient care.
Delirium presents formidable challenges: it affects one in four of older hospitalised adults, greatly elevates the risk of multiple short- and long-term complications including dementia and causes significant distress. Delirium care remains generally poor. Yet, there are clear grounds for optimism; the last decade has seen impactful policy advances and a tripling of research output. Here, we highlight three linked areas which have strong potential to transform delirium practice and knowledge in the near term. Delirium-related distress is strikingly underrepresented in practice guidance and research. Proactive recognition combined with effective clinical responses based on good communication provides a critical and largely untapped opportunity to improve care. Delirium epidemiology research is well positioned to produce novel insights through advanced prospective designs in populations such as emergency medical patients with detailed pre-, intra- and post-delirium assessments allied with fluid, imaging and other biomarkers. Research-grade assessment of delirium currently involves a chaotic array of tools, methods and diagnostic algorithms. Areas for development: expand and analytically distinguish the range of features assessed (including distress), optimise feature assessment including use of validated neuropsychological tests where possible, produce standardised algorithms which articulate explicit pathways from features to diagnosis, and create new fine-grained approaches to the measurement of severity. Delirium practice and knowledge show accelerating growth. This is encouraging but much of the necessary progress is still to come. Innovation in these three highlighted areas, as well as many others, will open up exciting possibilities in enhancing the care of patients with this common and often devastating condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available