4.5 Article

Mutual coupling reduction for monopole MIMO antenna using L-shaped stubs, defective ground and chip resistors

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2022.154524

Keywords

MIMO antenna; Mutual coupling reduction; L -shaped stub; Defected ground structure; Chip resistor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a symmetrical and compact monopole MIMO antenna with two feeding ports is designed to minimize mutual coupling between antenna elements. L-shaped stubs and defective ground structure (DGS) are used, along with chip resistors, to achieve improved isolation. The path of electric current is altered using rectangular slots etched on the metal ground as DGS to further enhance isolation. Loading chip resistors controls coupling current on the stubs and further strengthens isolation. Simulation and measurement results indicate -36 dB mutual coupling, 0.002 envelope correlation coefficient (ECC), 9.99 dB diversity gain (DG), and a radiant peak gain of 4.03 dBi for the antenna.
In this paper, a symmetrical and compact monopole multiple input multiple output (MIMO) antenna is designed with two feeding ports. To reduce the mutual coupling between antenna elements, the L-shaped stubs and the defective ground structure (DGS) are used, and additionally the chip resistors are loaded. By optimizing the length of stub, the elements isolation can be improved remarkably. Then, two rectangular slots are etched on the metal ground as DGS to change the path of electric current so as to enhance the isolation further. Also, through loading the chip resistors to control the coupling current on the stubs, the isolation can be strengthened once more. The simulation and measurement results show that this antenna has the mutual coupling of-36 dB, the envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) of 0.002 and the diversity gain (DG) of 9.99 dB at resonance along with the radiant peak gain of 4.03 dBi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available