4.4 Review

Comparing the Efficacy of Multiple Drugs Injection for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloid: A Network Meta-Analysis

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 465-472

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03163-4

Keywords

Pathological scar; Keloid; Hypertrophic scar; Network meta-analysis; Efficacy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

According to a network meta-analysis, a combination of TAC and BTA is the most effective treatment for pathological scars. The effectiveness of TAC+BTA is significantly different from that of BTA, TAC, 5-Fu, VER, or BLM monotherapies. TAC+5-Fu is more effective than TAC, 5-Fu, VER, or BLM alone, and BTA is more effective than both TAC and 5-Fu. VER and BLM have similar effectiveness, but both are better than TAC and 5-Fu. There were no significant differences between other local injection therapies.
Background There is no consensus regarding the choice of injected drugs for pathological scars. Although the clinical efficacy of different drug treatments was shown in many randomized controlled trials, the efficacies of many drugs are inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to determine how different effective drugs are for treating pathological scars. It is anticipated that the study findings may serve as guidelines for plastic surgeons.Methods Relevant literature was extracted from the following databases Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Weipu, and Wanfang until June 2022, such as randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating different injected drugs for the treatment of pathological scars, including BTA, TAC, 5-Fu, VER, and BLE.Results This network meta-analysis of 1539 patients from 23 articles revealed that the most effective treatment for a pathological scar was TAC + BTA. The effective rate of TAC + BTA combination therapy was significantly different from that of the BTA, TAC, 5-Fu, VER, and BLM monotherapies. TAC+5-FU was more effective than TAC, 5-FU, VER, or BLM alone, and BTA was more effective than both TAC and 5-Fu. The effectiveness of VER and BLM was the same, but both were better than TAC and 5-Fu. No big differences were found between any of the other local injection therapies.Conclusions According to this network meta-analysis, a combination of keloid and hypertrophic scar injection treatment is recommended, especially BTA+TAC. However, this network meta-analysis has some limitations and must be further verified by larger samples and higher quality RCTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available