Size reduction performance evaluation of HPGR/ball mill and HPGR/stirred mill for PGE bearing chromite ore

In the present study, size reduction experiments were performed on High-Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR), ball mill and stirred mill of PGE bearing chromite ore. The performance of HPGR was evaluated in two stages of size reduction to reduce energy consumption. In the first stage of HPGR, the effect of operating variables such as the gap between the rolls, roll speed, and specific pressing force on product size (P80) and energy consumption (ECS) was investigated. The process to get the smallest product size was optimized within the experimental range of investigation. The crushed product of HPGR was sub-jected to grinding in the second stage in a ball mill and stirred mill. The effect of mill speed, grinding time, and ball size on the performance of the ball mill was investigated and the product was further investi-gated in the second stage. A comparative analysis of the ball mill and stirred mill performance and energy consumption at different grinding time intervals was also performed. It was found that the ball mill con-sumed 54.67 kWh/t energy to reduce the F80 feed size of 722.2 mu m to P80 product size of 275.4 mu m while stirred mill consumed 32.45 kWh/t of energy to produce the product size of 235.6 mu m. It also showed that stirred mill produced finer product than the ball mill at around 40% lesser consumption of energy. It can be concluded that the HPGR-Stirred mill combination was a more energy-efficient grinding circuit than the HPGR-Ball mill combination for PGE bearing chromite ore.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Society of Powder Technology Japan.

Automated summary

In this study, experiments were conducted to reduce the size of PGE bearing chromite ore using HPGR, ball mill, and stirred mill. The performance of HPGR was evaluated in two stages, and its operating variables were optimized. The crushed product of HPGR was further ground in a ball mill and stirred mill, and a comparative analysis of their performance and energy consumption was conducted. It was found that the stirred mill produced a finer product with about 40% less energy consumption, indicating that the HPGR-stirred mill combination is a more energy-efficient grinding circuit.