4.8 Review

From Nanoscopic to Macroscopic Materials by Stimuli-Responsive Nanoparticle Aggregation

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202208995

Keywords

multiscale structures; stimuli-responsive materials; nanoparticle aggregation; nanoparticle assembly; functional materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stimuli-responsive nanoparticle (NP) aggregation is increasingly important in regulating NP assembly into superstructures at different length scales. Various external stimuli, like light, temperature, pH, electric, and magnetic fields, are used to adjust the aggregation of responsive NPs. The review summarizes the strategies for NP aggregation by external stimuli, their recent progress, and applications in nanoscale aggregates, microscale superstructures, and macroscale bulk materials. The future opportunities and challenges for designing functional materials through NP aggregation at different length scales are also discussed.
Stimuli-responsive nanoparticle (NP) aggregation plays an increasingly important role in regulating NP assembly into microscopic superstructures, macroscopic 2D, and 3D functional materials. Diverse external stimuli are widely used to adjust the aggregation of responsive NPs, such as light, temperature, pH, electric, and magnetic fields. Many unique structures based on responsive NPs are constructed including disordered aggregates, ordered superlattices, structural droplets, colloidosomes, and bulk solids. In this review, the strategies for NP aggregation by external stimuli, and their recent progress ranging from nanoscale aggregates, microscale superstructures to macroscale bulk materials along the length scales as well as their applications are summarized. The future opportunities and challenges for designing functional materials through NP aggregation at different length scales are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available