4.2 Article

Sex Differences in the Embryonic Development of the Central Oxytocin System in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jne.12364

Keywords

amygdala; foetal development; quantitative PCR; receptor binding

Funding

  1. NSF [IOS 1353859, IOS 1021957]
  2. Department of Biological Sciences at Kent State University
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1353859] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that oxytocin (OXT) may be important for organising the neural circuitry that underlies adult social behaviour. Although most of the work exploring these effects has focused on early postnatal development, there is evidence that OXT may also be important during foetal development. However, without an understanding of how the OXT system develops, the ability to functionally link OXT in foetal life to adult behaviour is limited. To understand where and when OXT could be acting during embryonic development to affect the organisation of neural substrates, we examined the development of the mouse OXT system from embryonic day (E) 12.5 through postnatal day (PND) 2 using OXT receptor (OXTR) binding and a quantitative polymerase chain reaction. In both males and females, OXTR binding was observed by E16.5 in the ventricular and subventricular zones, as well as the developing amygdala. In males, OXT mRNA was not detectable until PND2, whereas it was detectable by E16.5 in females. OXTR mRNA was detected by E12.5 in both sexes, although females appear to have more OXTR mRNA during foetal development than males. The present study is significant because it is the first to reveal an unexpected sex difference in the development of the OXT system and supports the possibility that OXT during foetal development may contribute to sex differences in adult behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available