4.3 Article

Neurophysiological hyperresponsivity to sensory input in autism spectrum disorders

Journal

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s11689-016-9162-9

Keywords

Individual differences; Heterogeneity; Contrast sensitivity; Autism; Sensory hypersensitivity

Funding

  1. NIH Mentored Research Scientist Development Award [K01MH087720]
  2. NIH center grant [U54HD082008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Atypical sensory processing is a common clinical observation in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Neural hyperexcitability has been suggested as the cause for sensory hypersensitivity, a frequently reported clinical observation in ASD. We examined visual evoked responses to parametric increases in stimulus contrast in order to model neural responsivity of sensory systems in ASD. Methods: Thirteen high-functioning individuals with ASD and 12 typically developing (TD) individuals completed a steady-state visual evoked potential study. Stimuli were vertical circular gratings oscillating at 3.76 Hz at varying contrasts (5, 10, 20, ... , 90 % contrast, 10 levels). The average spectral power at the stimulus oscillation frequency was calculated for each contrast level. Results: The magnitude of evoked sensory responses increased at a significantly greater rate and resulted in disproportionately elevated activation with higher contrasts in the ASD group. Approximately 45 % of ASD participants had rates of response increases greater than any TD participant. This alteration was highly associated with parental reports of these participants' sensory difficulties. Conclusions: Greater increases in visual responses over contrast manipulation suggest heightened excitability in the sensory cortex in ASD participants. Heightened neural excitability was observed in a substantial portion but not all of the ASD participants. This pattern suggests that individuals with higher excitability may constitute a neurobiologically distinct subgroup requiring individualized treatment interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available