4.0 Article

Pollen morphology and flower visitors of Leiotulus aureus (Sm.) Pimenov & Ostr. (Apiaceae)

Journal

ACTA BOTANICA CROATICA
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 44-51

Publisher

UNIV ZAGREB, FAC SCIENCE, DIV BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.37427/botcro-2023-003

Keywords

Malabaila aurea; light microscopy; LM; palynomorphology; scanning electron microscopy; SEM; insect pollinators

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the pollen grains of Leiotulus aureus using light and scanning electron microscopy, contributing to the taxonomical and melissopalynological studies of the species. Flower visitors and their pollination types were also observed and analyzed, with a focus on the species' contribution to bee pasture. The pollen grains of L. aureus were found to be isopolar, radially symmetrical, medium to large in size, and had a rugulate-microperforate sculpturing pattern. Honey bees were the most frequent visitors of the flowers, mainly during midday.
The pollen grains of Leiotulus aureus (syn. Malabaila aurea (Sm.) Boiss.) were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy in order to contribute to the taxonomical and melissopalynological studies of the species. Flower visitors have also been observed and analyzed aiming at the clarification of some pollination aspects including the species contribution to bee pasture. The pollen grains of L. aureus are isopolar, radially symmetrical, medium to large in size, tri- colporate and perprolate. They are slightly equatorially constricted with obtuse polar caps and triangular in polar view. The sculpturing pattern is rugulate-microperforate. With regard to flower visitors, the following pollination types oc- curred: melittophily, myophily and sapromyophily and cantharophily. Some insects attracted by L. aureus cannot be con-sidered pollinators but casual visitors. The flowers were the most frequently visited by honey bees during midday.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available