4.5 Article

In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 93-101

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2272-0

Keywords

Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Glioma; Isocitrate dehydrogenase; IDH1/2; ATRX; 1p/19q LOH; MGMT; Integrated diagnosis; Haarlem consensus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for in vivo molecular profiling of human glioma. Normalized mean kurtosis (MKn) and mean diffusivity (MDn) metrics from DKI were assessed in 50 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma. The results were compared in regard to the WHO-based histological findings and molecular characteristics leading to integrated diagnosis (Haarlem Consensus): isocitrate-dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) mutation status, alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) expression, chromosome 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. MKn was significantly lower in tumors with IDH1/2 mutation (0.43 +/- 0.09) and ATRX loss of expression (0.41 +/- 0.11) than in those with IDH1/2 wild type (0.57 +/- 0.09, p < 0.001) and ATRX maintained expression (0.51 +/- 0.10, p = 0.004), respectively. Regarding the integrated molecular diagnosis, MKn was significantly higher in primary glioblastoma (0.57 +/- 0.10) than in astrocytoma (0.39 +/- 0.11, p < 0.001) and oligodendroglioma (0.47 +/- 0.05, p = 0.003). MK may be used to provide insight into the human glioma molecular profile regarding IDH1/2 mutation status and ATRX expression. Considering the diagnostic and prognostic significance of these molecular markers, MK appears to be a promising in vivo biomarker for glioma. The diagnostic performance of MK seems to fit more with the integrated molecular approach than the conventional histological findings of the current WHO 2007 classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available