4.5 Review

Advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2299-2

Keywords

Glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; Brain cancer; Vaccines

Funding

  1. Irish Cancer Society Research Fellowship [CRF13TIV]
  2. Tesco Charity
  3. ERASMUS+ program
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [12/IA/1421]
  5. SFI Research Centre
  6. Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research (AMBER) [SFI/12/RC/2278]
  7. Science Foundation Ireland [14/IA/2582]
  8. Brain Tumour Ireland
  9. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [14/IA/2582] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumour, associated with extremely poor prognosis and although there have been therapeutic advances, treatment options remain limited. This review focuses on the use of immunotherapy, harnessing the power of the host's immune system to reject cancer cells. Key challenges in glioma specific immunotherapy as with many other cancers are the limited immunogenicity of the cancer cells and the immunosuppressive environment of the tumour. Although specific antigens have been identified in several cancers; brain tumours, such as GBM, are considered poorly immunogenic. However, as detailed in this review, strategies aimed at circumventing these challenges are showing promise for GBM treatment; including identification of glioma specific antigens and endogenous immune cell activation in an attempt to overcome the immunosuppressive environment which is associated with GBM tumours. An up-to-date summary of current Phase I/II and ongoing Phase III GBM immunotherapy clinical trials is provided in addition to insights into promising preclinical approaches which are focused predominantly on increased induction of Type 1 helper T cell (T(h)1) immune responses within patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available