4.3 Review

In vitro models of aortic valve calcification: solidifying a system

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR PATHOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2014.08.003

Keywords

Calcific aortic valve disease; Model; Quantification methods; In vitro

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship) [DGE-0909667]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL094707, HL115103]
  3. National Science Foundation [1055384]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1055384] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) affects 25% of people over 65, and the late-stage stenotic state can only be treated with total valve replacement, requiring 85,000 surgeries annually in the US alone (University of Maryland Medical Center, 2013, http://umm.edu/programs/services/heart-center-programs/cardiothoracic-surgery/ valve-surgery/facts). As CAVD is an age-related disease, many of the affected patients are unable to undergo the open-chest surgery that is its only current cure. This challenge motivates the elucidation of the mechanisms involved in calcification, with the eventual goal of alternative preventative and therapeutic strategies. There is no sufficient animal model of CAVD, so we turn to potential in vitro models. In general, in vitro models have the advantages of shortened experiment time and better control over multiple variables compared to in vivo models. As with all models, the hypothesis being tested dictates the most important characteristics of the in vivo physiology to recapitulate. Here, we collate the relevant pieces of designing and evaluating aortic valve calcification so that investigators can more effectively draw significant conclusions from their results. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available