4.2 Article

Do non-performing loans matter for bank lending and the business cycle in euro area countries?

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 1050-1080

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2022.2094668

Keywords

Euro area countries; non-performing loans; panel Bayesian VAR; hierarchical priors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that changes in non-performing loan (NPL) ratios have a significant impact on banking sector variables and the macroeconomy. An increase in NPL ratios leads to a decrease in bank lending, widening of lending spreads, and a fall in real GDP growth and residential real estate prices. Shocks to the change in NPL ratios explain a relatively large share of the variance in the VAR, particularly in countries with a high increase in NPL ratios during recent crises. A three-year scenario analysis suggests that reducing NPL ratios can have significant benefits for macroeconomic and financial conditions.
We estimate the impact of changes in non-performing loan (NPL) ratios on aggregate banking sector variables and the macroeconomy by estimating a panel Bayesian VAR model for twelve euro area countries. The main findings are as follows: i) An impulse response analysis shows that an exogenous increase in the change in NPL ratios tends to depress bank lending volumes, widens bank lending spreads and leads to a fall in real GDP growth and residential real estate prices; ii) A forecast error variance decomposition shows that shocks to the change in NPL ratios explain a relatively large share of the variance of the variables in the VAR, particularly for countries that experienced a large increase in NPL ratios during the recent crises; and iii) A three-year structural out-of-sample scenario analysis suggests that reducing banks' NPL ratios can produce significant benefits in terms of improved macroeconomic and financial conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available