3.8 Article

The Role of Trade and Energy in Generating Carbon Emissions and Environmental Degradation

Publisher

INT CENTRE SUSTAINABLE DEV ENERGY WATER & ENV SYSTEMS-SDEWES
DOI: 10.13044/j.sdewes.d9.0397

Keywords

African countries; EKC model; Energy intensity; Generalised method of moment; Trade openness; Pollution haven hypothesis; Random coefficients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the role of goods trade and energy in generating carbon emissions using a panel of African countries. The findings indicate that trade increases emissions and there is a non-linear relationship between trade and emissions. Energy also contributes to emissions. Furthermore, the study finds no evidence that trade allows Africa to adopt energy-efficient production techniques that reduce carbon emissions.
Studies have incorporated trade and energy as determinants of emissions in the environmental Kuznets curve model to mitigate carbon emissions. These studies mostly focused on the overall trade without regard to goods trade that is more polluting. To this end, this study used a panel of African countries and investigate the role of goods trade and energy in generating carbon emissions. We utilized random coefficients and the generalised method of moment. Our findings confirmed the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Findings further indicate that trade increases emissions and there exists evidence of non-linear nexus between trade and emissions. The composition effect increases emissions, but the effect is not robust to different estimates. Energy increases emissions, and the indirect effect of trade through energy revealed no evidence that trade has allowed Africa the use of an energy-efficient technique of production which reduces carbon emissions. Findings also confirmed the existence of income and factor abundance pollution haven hypothesis. Therefore, trade and energy should be considered in emissions mitigation policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available