3.8 Article

Concurrent valve replacement and caesarean section for rheumatic mitral valve disease with refractory heart failure in late pregnancy

Journal

OBSTETRIC MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 156-161

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1753495X221118433

Keywords

Rheumatic heart disease; valve replacement; pulmonary edema; mitral stenosis; pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of women who underwent concurrent valve replacement with caesarean section for severe rheumatic mitral valve disease with refractory heart failure. The results suggest that under certain conditions, pregnant women with rheumatic disease can consider concurrent valve replacement surgery and caesarean section.
Objective: To assess clinical characteristics and outcomes of women who underwent concurrent valve replacement with caesarean section for severe rheumatic mitral valve disease with refractory heart failure. Methods: All women admitted to a single centre from 2011 to 2020 with severe rheumatic mitral valve disease, having recurrent episodes of pulmonary edema on optimal medical therapy and contraindication to percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy, who underwent concurrent valve replacement (for native valve disease) along with caesarean section, were included. Results: Among 1300 pregnancies with rheumatic heart disease, six underwent the concurrent procedure. All had replacement of mitral valve except one who had both aortic and mitral valve replacements, between 33 and 39 weeks of gestation. There were no maternal deaths, and there was one neonatal loss from late-onset sepsis. Conclusion: Pregnant women with severe rheumatic mitral valve disease with refractory heart failure, unsuitable for minimal access interventions, can be considered for a concurrent valve replacement with caesarean section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available