3.8 Article

Comparison between the International Classification of Primary Care and the International Classification of Diseases Classifications in Primary Care in Korea

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 305-311

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.22.0119

Keywords

International Classification of Diseases; International Classification of Primary Care; Primary Health Care; Korea

Funding

  1. National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency [NECA-C-15-008]
  2. Korean Academy of Family Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the practicality of ICPC-2 in Korean primary care and found that it can be a feasible complementary means for diagnosing common diseases.
Background: The International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) is a classification method designed for primary care. Although previous studies have found that ICPC-2 is a useful tool for demonstrating the relationship between patients' expectations and health providers' diagnoses, its utility of ICPC-2 has yet to be fully studied in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the practicality of ICPC-2 in Korean primary care.Methods: The study was conducted at primary care clinics in Seoul and Gyeonggi areas from October to November 2015. Third-year family medicine residents examined and analyzed the medical records of patients who visited primary care physicians using ICPC-2, and the results were compared with those obtained using the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) (Korean version: Korean Standard Classification of Diseases-7).Results: A total of 26 primary care physicians from 23 primary care clinics participated in the study. Furthermore, 2,458 ICD-10 codes and 6,091 ICPC-2 codes were recorded from the data of 1,099 patients. The common disease codes were vasomotor and allergic rhinitis (J30), according to ICD-10, and acute upper respiratory infection (R74) in ICPC-2. Comparing disease status by body systems, the proportion of gastrointestinal disease with ICD-10 codes was significantly higher than that with ICPC-2 codes (P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with >4 diagnoses accounted for 36% of the ICD-10 classifications, whereas those with >4 diagnoses accounted for 4% of the ICPC-2 classifications.Conclusion: Introducing ICPC as a complementary means for diagnosing common diseases could be a practical approach in Korean primary care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available