4.7 Article

Stagnation-point heat and mass transfer of MHD Maxwell nanofluids over a stretching surface in the presence of thermophoresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages 1172-1180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.082

Keywords

Stagnation-point flow; Maxwell nanofluids; Thermophoresis; Brownian motion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21206009, 21576023]
  2. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFC0700601, 2016YFC0700603]
  3. Science Research Foundation of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture [00331616027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stagnation-point heat and mass transfer of MHD Maxwell nanofluids over a stretching surface in the presence of thermophoresis have been investigated. Convective heat transfer boundary condition and Brownian motion are both taken into account. The boundary layer momentum, energy and concentration governing equations based on the upper convected Maxwell constitutive model are established. With the proper similarity variables, the nonlinear partial differential equations are transformed into a set of coupled ordinary differential equations. The homotopy analysis method (HAM) with three auxiliary parameters is presented to obtain the analytical solutions in the form of exponential series functions, which shows a good agreement with the previous results. The effects of various parameters on the velocity, temperature and concentration fields are discussed graphically. Results show that the velocity and the skin friction coefficient are decreasing with the increasing of the Maxwell parameter. The larger value of the stagnation parameter is, the thinner velocity boundary layer thickness goes. The thermophoresis restricts the heat and mass transfer. The Brownian motion resists the heat flux, but promotes the mass flux. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available