4.2 Article

Policy-Relevant Spatial Inidicators of Urban Liveability And Sustainability: Scaling From Local to Global

Journal

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 321-334

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2022.2076215

Keywords

Liveability; urban planning and health; built environment and design; epidemiological modelling; spatial data and applications; geospatial analysis; network analysis

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1061404, 9100001, GNT1107672]
  2. Australian Government National Environmental Science Program - Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub
  3. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth) under a Sustainable Development Goals Partnership Grant
  4. Australian Catholic University
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Public Good Projects
  7. Global Challenges Research Fund
  8. RMIT University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper outlines the challenges and lessons from a 5-year collaborative research program, which extended a software workflow for calculating a composite indicator of urban liveability for residential address points across Melbourne to Australia's 21 largest cities and further to 25 global cities with diverse contexts.
Urban liveability is a global priority for creating healthy, sustainable cities. Measurement of policy-relevant spatial indicators of the built and natural environment supports city planning at all levels of government. Analysis of their spatial distribution within cities, and impacts on individuals and communities, is crucial to ensure planning decisions are effective and equitable. This paper outlines challenges and lessons from a 5-year collaborative research program, scaling up a software workflow for calculating a composite indicator of urban liveability for residential address points across Melbourne, to Australia's 21 largest cities, and further extension to 25 global cities in diverse contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available