4.7 Article

Validation of the 4-Item and 10-Item Uncertainty Stress Scale in a Community-Based Sample of Chinese Adults

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 2803-2813

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S379180

Keywords

Validation; Uncertainty Stress Scale; Community-based Sample

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China
  3. Shenzhen Humanities & Social Sciences Key Research Bases of the Center for Mental Health, Shenzhen University
  4. [2018A030307002]
  5. [31871115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Uncertainty Stress Scale (USS) and compare two versions of the scale among a large community-based sample of Chinese adults. The findings confirmed that both versions of USS had good internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity. The 4-item USS was as effective as the 10-item USS in measuring uncertainty stress, suggesting it can be used as a time-efficient alternative.
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to examine the psychometric properties of the Uncertainty Stress Scale (USS) and to compare the usefulness of two versions of the scale (USS-4 and USS-10) among a large community-based sample of Chinese adults. Participants and Methods: The Uncertainty Stress Scale was validated in 904 community residents (mean age: 32.71 +/- 10.99; male: 41.7%) through an online survey conducted in February 2020. Psychometric properties of reliability (Cronbach's alpha), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis), and criterion validity (correlation and ROC curve analyses) were evaluated using established benchmarks. To validate the USS, we used the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS). In addition, sensitivity, specificity, and suitable cutoff values of the two versions of USS were determined. Results: Both versions of the USS had high internal consistency (USS-10: 0.941; USS-4: 0.851). Confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-factor structure for both measures. Both USS-4 and USS-10 scores were significantly positively correlated with CPSS Conclusion: The findings of the current study confirmed that the psychometric properties of two Chinese versions of USS are acceptable. Furthermore, the 4-item USS was as effective as the 10-item USS for the measurement of uncertainty stress in our community-based sample of Chinese adults suggesting that the USS-4 is a time-efficient alternative to the USS-10 which can be used when the circumstances require a time-efficient instrument (eg, in epidemiological studies with a large test battery).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available