3.9 Article

Exposure to China dust exacerbates testicular toxicity induced by cyclophosphamide in mice

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 115-125

Publisher

KOREAN SOC TOXICOLOGY
DOI: 10.1007/s43188-022-00149-x

Keywords

Cyclophosphamide; China dust; Testicular toxicity; Oxidative damage; Apoptotic cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the potential effects of China dust exposure on cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity in mice, and found that the exposure to China dust exacerbated the testicular toxicity induced by cyclophosphamide, possibly due to the induction of lipid peroxidation and reduced antioxidant activity.
This study investigated the potential effects of China dust (CD) exposure on cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced testicular toxicity in mice, focusing on spermatogenesis and oxidative damage. CP treatment reduced testicular and epididymal weight and sperm motility and enhanced sperm abnormality. Histopathological examination presented various morphological alterations in the testis, including increased exfoliation of spermatogenic cells, degeneration of early spermatogenic cells, vacuolation of Sertoli cells, a decreased number of spermatogonia/spermatocytes/spermatids, along with a high number of apoptotic cells. In addition, the testis exhibited reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and glutathione reductase (GR) activity and enhanced malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration. Meanwhile, CD exposure exacerbated testicular histopathological alterations induced by CP. CD exposure also aggravated oxidative damage by increasing the lipid peroxidative product MDA and decreasing GSH levels and antioxidant enzyme activities in the testis. These results suggest that CD exposure exacerbates CP-induced testicular toxicity in mice, which might be attributed to the induction of lipid peroxidation and reduced antioxidant activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available