3.8 Review

Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 37-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.014

Keywords

Knee; Arthroplasty; Mechanical alignment; Kinematic alignment; Restricted kinematic alignment; KA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) is an improved method for restoring native knee kinematics, avoiding excessive alignment issues. Compared to traditional kinematic alignment (MA), rKA shows similar or slightly better outcome scores (PROMs) without increasing the risk of implant failure. Long-term clinical studies are needed to confirm this trend.
Introduction: Kinematic alignment (KA) has increased in popularity in recent years, becoming a viable alternative to MA with encouraging short-and mid-term follow-up results. Recently, the concept of restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) has been developed to restore native knee kinematics better, avoiding failure of coronal alignment. This systematic review aims to examine whether rKA improves outcome scores (PROMs) compared with MA and to evaluate the radiographic analysis of the lower limb alignment and the causes of complications and reoperations with the rKA approach. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The following key terms were used: restricted kinematic alignment, rKA, kinematic align-ment, primary total knee arthroplasty, primary total knee replacement, TKA rKA, and TKR rKA. The initial screening identified 328 studies. Each eligible article was evaluated according to the inclusion criteria: studies with levels of evidence (LoE) 1 to 4, written in English, published through May 2022, and involving human subjects. Criteria from the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) were used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.Results: Six clinical studies were included in this systematic review. The study was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 574 knees were included. After excluding patients due to loss of follow-up or missing data, 475 knees were analyzed. The following rKA-related data were evaluated: patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs), radiographic analysis of the lower limb alignment, and causes of complications and reoperations.Conclusions: The rKA is an improved concept for restoring native knee kinematics, avoiding excessive coronal varus/valgus alignment. It provides equivalent or slightly better PROMs than MA without increasing the risk of short-middle-term implant failure. Clinical studies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm this trend.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available