4.4 Article

The Spectrum of CFTR Variants in Nonwhite Cystic Fibrosis Patients Implications for Molecular Diagnostic Testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 39-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.07.005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc. [SCHRIJ11A0-NOA47100]
  2. CF Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the implementation of cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening programs across the United States, the identification of CFTR gene variants in nonwhite populations compared with whites remains suboptimal. Our objective was to establish the spectrum of CFTR variants and their frequencies in CF patients in the United States with African, Native American, Asian, East Indian, or Middle Eastern backgrounds. By using direct DNA sequencing, we identified two CFTR variants in 89 of 140 affected nonwhite individuals with uncharacterized genotypes. Seven variants were novel. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detected 14 rearrangements in the remaining 51 patients, 6 of which were novel. Deletions and duplications accounted for 17% of unidentified alleles. A cross-sectional analysis of genotyping data from the CF Foundation Patient Registry was performed, comparing 3496 nonwhite patients with 22,206 white CF patients. Patients of Hispanic, black, or Asian ancestry were less likely to have two identified CFTR variants (P < 0.0001 for Hispanics and blacks, P = 0.003 for Asians), and more likely to carry no mutations on the commonly used 23 mutation carrier screening panel (P < 0.0001). We analyzed the mutations recorded for each ancestry and summarized the most frequent ones. This research could facilitate equity in mutation detection between white and nonwhite or mixed-ethnicity CF patients, enabling an earlier diagnosis improving their quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available