4.6 Article

Tourist gaze upon a slum tourism destination: A case study of Dharavi, India

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 478-486

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.08.008

Keywords

Tourist gaze; Slum tourism; Dharavi; Travel experience; Tourist perceptions; Slum tourists

Funding

  1. Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [721QN223]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applied the concept of the 'tourist gaze' to investigate tourists' perceptions of slum tourism in Dharavi, India, using reviews collected from TripAdvisor. The study found that tourists focused on the local environment and residents during their visits and that their perceptions and attitudes towards slums changed after the experience. The study also developed a model of the slum tourism travel experience and provided suggestions for improving slum tourism from the perspective of tourists.
This study applied the concept of the 'tourist gaze' to investigate tourists' perceptions of slum tourism in Asia's largest slum community, Dharavi, India, using 458 reviews collected from the travel comparison website, TripAdvisor. In this study the application of the tourist gaze concept has been extended by exploring the functions of tourist gaze in the context of slum tourism. It was found that tourists tended to gaze upon the local environment (natural, socio-cultural, and economic environment) and residents (residents' spirit, residents' life, and local tour guides) during their visits. The study further demonstrated that tourists' perceptions of slums and their attitudes towards life, changed after gazing upon slum destinations. Theoretically, a model of the slum tourism travel experience has been developed, based on the findings of this study. Practically, this study offers suggestions for slum tourism operators, to better improve slum tourism from the perspective of tourists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available