4.3 Article

How co-production contributes to urban equality: retrospective lessons from Dar es Salaam

Journal

ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 278-293

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09562478221114023

Keywords

co-production; community infrastructure; Dar es Salaam; pathways; urban inequalities

Funding

  1. ESRF under the Global Challenges Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the implementation of co-production in the low-income settlement of Hanna Nassif in Dar es Salaam, focusing on basic infrastructure and local employment. The findings suggest that co-production fostered partnerships and transformed sociocultural norms, contributing to urban equality in the settlement. However, it did not address inequalities among partners and was not replicable in other areas.
Despite varying conceptions of what co-production entails, there is a growing consensus in research, practice and public policy discourse that co-production is a preferred strategy for leveraging resources to deliver basic infrastructure services in low-income settlements. Using largely qualitative data, this paper explores the adaption of co-production in the low-income settlement of Hanna Nassif in Dar es Salaam, implemented 20 years ago by state actors, international agencies and grassroots actors, with attention to basic infrastructure and local employment. The findings reveal that co-production engendered partnerships and platforms and transformed sociocultural norms and values that made inroads toward urban equality in the settlement, although it failed to address inequalities among the partners, or to be replicated subsequently. The paper argues that meaningful co-production of basic infrastructure services in low-income settlements of the global South requires a focus on the context-specific pro-poor concerns and priorities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available