4.1 Article

The factor structure of cognitive reflection, numeracy, and fluid intelligence: The evidence from the Polish adaptation of the Verbal CRT

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2297

Keywords

cognitive reflection; decision making; fluid intelligence; numeracy; rationality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present research aims to investigate the generalizability of the Verbal CRT in cultural contexts outside the US/UK and to test the factor structure linking traditional-numerical CRT, Verbal CRT, numeracy, and fluid intelligence. The results show that the Verbal CRT is a valid cognitive reflection measure even in different language and cultural contexts.
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) is one of the most popular measures of individual differences in rational thought and decision making. To overcome the issue of overlap with numeracy, a novel measure of cognitive reflection less related to numeracy and math anxiety than Numerical CRT was developed-Verbal CRT. The present research had two main aims: first to investigate the generalizability of Verbal CRT in cultural contexts outside the United States/United Kingdom and second to test the factor structure linking traditional-numerical-CRT, Verbal CRT, numeracy, and fluid intelligence. In Studies 1a and 1b, we adapted and tested the validity and psychometric properties of Polish versions of tasks and scales. Next, using a large and diverse sample of Polish adults, we tested five models of the factor structure of cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions (Study 2). The most parsimonious and best-fitted model contained three latent variables: Verbal CRT, numeracy (composed of the items from the Berlin Numeracy Test and traditional-numerical-CRT), and fluid intelligence. In line with previous research, our results show that Verbal CRT is a valid cognitive reflection measure that provides a clearer interpretation than traditional CRT, even in a different language and cultural context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available