4.4 Article

Development of the Japanese version of the Depression Literacy Scale

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 68, Issue 8, Pages 1708-1715

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00207640211057728

Keywords

Depression literacy; measurement scale; mental health; reliability and validity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed the Japanese version of the Depression Literacy Scale (D-Lit-J) and examined its validity and reliability. The results showed that the D-Lit-J demonstrated credible known-group validity, with good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Background: Depression is a major social concern in Japan. It is therefore necessary to develop a scale in Japanese that can assess depression literacy. Aims: The present study aimed to develop the Japanese version of the Depression Literacy Scale (D-Lit-J), and examined its validity and reliability. Methods: Three groups were administered the D-Lit-J, including 117 first-year university English literature students, 112 first-year medical school students, and 53 psychiatrists. Among these, 112 (95.7%), 112 (100%), and 29 subjects (54.7%) returned completed questionnaires, respectively. The total D-Lit-J scores were compared between the three groups to assess known-group validity, and internal reliability was examined by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Medical students were asked to complete the questionnaire a second time, 3 weeks later (11 students did not respond), to assess the test-retest reliability using the intra-class correlation coefficient. Results: The total D-Lit-J scores (mean +/- SD) were 7.61 +/- 4.18, 9.51 +/- 4.37, and 17.7 +/- 3.15, for English literature students, medical students, and psychiatrists, respectively, and there were significant differences between the three groups (p < .05). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from .800 to .834 in all students, and was .764 in psychiatrists, revealing a good internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient of the scale was .769. Conclusions: The D-Lit-J showed a credible known-group validity, with good internal and test-retest reliabilities. Additional studies with a greater variety of subjects and that examine concurrent or discriminant validity will be necessary in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available