4.3 Article

Trends in Prison Sentences and Racial Disparities: 20-Years of Sentencing Under Florida's Criminal Punishment Code

Journal

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 300-338

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00224278221120677

Keywords

Sentencing; courts; race; ethnicity; racial disparity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the rise in criminal histories and the presence of punitive policies, the U.S. prison population has seen a decrease in racial disparities, indicating that court actors in Florida have used discretionary tools to reduce prison use.
Objectives The U.S. prison population has fallen 15% overall, 28% for Blacks, and 21% for Hispanics since the Great Recession began. These trends occurred despite rising defendant criminal histories and the continued presence of the punitive policies that drove mass incarceration. We test the central hypothesis that court actors employed several discretionary tools available under Florida's sentencing system to reduce prison use, which in turn reduced direct and indirect racial disparities. Methods To test this hypothesis, we utilized 20 years of felony cases. Our analyses employ current best practices for testing interactive effects and decomposition models to identify changes in prison use and the factors associated with these changes. Results We find criminal history scores rose sharply, but prison use and racial disparities therein fell markedly in the past decade. The key factors driving these trends are reductions in the influence of criminal history on decision-making, increased use of mitigated departures, and the flexibility of Florida's sentencing system to accommodate mitigated departures. In fact, if Florida's sentencing rules had been followed more closely, racial disparities in prison sentences would have grown. Conclusions This research has implications for reforms aimed at ending mass incarceration and reducing racial disparities in imprisonment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available