Understanding Wage Theft : Evasion and avoidance responses to minimum wage increases

This paper presents strong evidence that minimum wage increases lead to a greater prevalence of subminimum wage payment. Using the Current Population Survey, we estimate that increases in measured underpayment following minimum wage increases average between 12 and 17 percent of realized wage gains. Our baseline analyses focus on workers ages 16 to 25, while additional analyses consider workers ages 16 to 65. In addition, we find that firms and workers comply to a far greater degree with minimum wage increases that are forecastable, modest, and regular than with minimum wage increases enacted through new legislation. We also find evidence that states' enforcement regimes influence the compliance patterns we observe. We interpret these findings as ev-idence that while minimum wage compliance is the norm, noncompliance is an important, economically nuanced reality in the low-wage labor market.

Automated summary

This paper provides strong evidence that the increase in minimum wage leads to a prevalent payment below the minimum wage. The study estimates that the underpayment following minimum wage increases averages between 12 and 17 percent of realized wage gains for workers aged 16 to 25. Additionally, it finds that firms and workers are more likely to comply with forecastable, modest, and regular minimum wage increases compared to those enacted through new legislation. The study also suggests that states' enforcement regimes influence compliance patterns.