4.1 Article

Adolescents' perceptions of social risk and prosocial tendencies: Developmental change and individual differences

Journal

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 188-203

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sode.12630

Keywords

adolescence; prosocial tendencies; social risk perceptions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a link between prosocial tendencies and social risk perceptions in adolescents. This link changes significantly across adolescence, with younger adolescents showing a negative association between prosocial tendencies and social risk tolerance, while relatively older adolescents show a marginal positive association. Individual differences also emerge, with empathy being a significant factor.
Many prosocial behaviors involve social risks such as speaking out against a popular opinion, bias, group norm, or authority. However, little is known about whether adolescents' prosocial tendencies develop over time with their perceptions of social risks. This accelerated longitudinal study used within-subject growth-curve analyses to test the link between adolescents' prosocial tendencies and social risk perceptions. Adolescents completed self-reports annually for 3 years (N = 893; M-age = 12.30 years, 10-14 years at Wave 1, and 10-17 years across the full study period; 50% girls, 33% White non-Latinx, 27% Latinx, 20% African American, 20% mixed/other race). The association between social risk tolerance and prosocial tendencies changed significantly across adolescence. Specifically, for younger adolescents, more prosocial tendencies were associated significantly with less social risk tolerance, whereas for relatively older adolescents, more prosocial tendencies were associated marginally with more social risk tolerance. Additional individual differences by empathy (but not sensation seeking) emerged. These findings suggest that prosocial tendencies across adolescence may be associated with an underlying ability to tolerate social risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available