4.7 Article

Stock market return predictability: A combination forecast perspective

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102376

Keywords

Stock market; Return predictability; Combination forecast; Business cycles; Portfolio performances

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672009, 71972011, 72002005]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education [21YJA790028]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2020M670171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the predictability of stock market returns based on traditional macroeconomic variables. The empirical results suggest that the mean combination forecast model outperforms other models in forecasting stock market returns, and its performance remains robust across different forecasting windows, market conditions, and multi-step-ahead forecasts. Importantly, the mean combination forecast consistently generates higher CER gains compared to other models, considering different investors' risk aversion coefficients and trading costs.
Based on traditional macroeconomic variables, this paper mainly investigates the predictability of these variables for stock market return. The empirical results show the mean combination forecast model can achieve superior out-of-sample performance than the other forecasting models for forecasting the stock market returns. In addition, the performances of the mean combination forecast model are also robust during different forecasting windows, different market conditions, and multi-step-ahead forecasts. Importantly, the mean combination forecast consistently generates higher CER gains than other models considering different investors' risk aversion coefficients and trading costs. This paper tries to provide more evidence of combination forecast model to predict stock market returns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available