4.3 Article

The sociology and practice of translation: interaction, indexicality, and power

Journal

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14687941221124736

Keywords

translation; methodology; social theory; ethnography; power; ethnography; multilingualism; Asia

Funding

  1. german research foundation (DFG) [2011-1014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the sociology and practices of translation, arguing that translation work should be understood as an indexical, social, and interactive practice that produces a third space of difference. The study reveals the importance of cooperation between local translators and researchers in translation, transcription, and interaction analyses. Additionally, the article emphasizes the need for reflections on social theory and scientific text production in order to make translation practice understandable.
This article addresses the sociology and practices of translation. The main argument is that translation work should be understood in ethnomethodological terms as an indexical, social, and interactive practice that produces an ongoing third space of difference. The article provides insights into the practice of ethnographic translation work in a multilingual and foreign research context. The study reveals that cooperation between locally involved translators and researchers is highly productive-even necessary-for translation, transcription, and interaction analyses. Moreover, the article argues that in order to make translation practice understandable, not only ethnographic research, linguistic knowledge and cooperation between translators and researchers is required but equally reflections on social theory and the production of scientific texts. Finally, a novel sociologically informed methodology of translation work for qualitative social research is offered using the concepts of cooperation, indexicality, power, representation, and third space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available