4.5 Article

Linking the Pathway from Exposure to Online Vaccine Information to Cyberchondria During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated Mediation Model

Journal

CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 625-633

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0045

Keywords

cyberchondria; e-health literacy; exposure to online vaccine information; perceived information overload

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the development of cyberchondria when individuals search for COVID-19 vaccine-related information on the Internet. The results indicate a direct positive relationship between exposure to online vaccine information and cyberchondria, which is partially mediated by perceived information overload. Additionally, e-health literacy negatively moderates the indirect relationship between exposure to online vaccine information and cyberchondria.
Cyberchondria describes excessive health information seeking on the Internet is associated with escalating concerns and anxiety. Drawing upon the stimulus-organism-response model, this study proposes a moderated mediation model to explore how people develop cyberchondria when they search for COVID-19 vaccine-related information on the Internet. To test the proposed model, an online survey was conducted in China. Results showed that there was a direct and positive relationship between exposure to online vaccine information and cyberchondria. This relationship was also partially mediated by perceived information overload. Moreover, e-health literacy negatively moderated the indirect relationship between exposure to online vaccine information and cyberchondria through perceived information overload. The results from this study can advance our knowledge on the development of cyberchondria during public health crises, and inform health professionals and social media operators on developing evidence-based interventions to manage this issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available