Political elite discourses polarize attitudes toward immigration along ideological lines. A comparative longitudinal analysis of Europe in the twenty-first century

Immigration is a hotly-debated topic in many countries around the world. We examine how immigration-related political elite discourses affect natives' attitudes towards immigration and how these discourses contribute to polarisation along political and socio-economic dimensions. Drawing upon longitudinal cross-national data from the European Social Survey over 18 years and a genuine within-country estimator for both country-level main effects and cross-level interactions, our results show that, controlling for actual immigration, anti-immigrant attitudes increase when political elites express more exclusionary sentiments towards immigration and decrease when political elites express more inclusionary sentiments. Deeper analyses reveal exclusionary political elite discourses primarily resonate with voters on the right, whereas the effects of inclusionary discourses do not vary with political orientation. We do not find any attitude polarisation between lower- and highly-educated individuals. In sum, our results indicate that ideological and discursive aspects of inter-group conflict are more important than real-world conditions.

Automated summary

This study examines how immigration-related political elite discourses affect natives' attitudes towards immigration and contribute to polarization. The results indicate that anti-immigrant attitudes increase when political elites express more exclusionary sentiments towards immigration, while they decrease when political elites express more inclusionary sentiments. Furthermore, exclusionary discourses primarily resonate with right-wing voters.