4.7 Article

Promoting Australian regional airports with subsidy schemes: Optimised downstream logistics using vehicle routing problem

Journal

TRANSPORT POLICY
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 38-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.014

Keywords

Airfreight distribution; Regional development; Subsidy schemes; Open vehicle routing problem (VRP); Sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the effectiveness of subsidy programs in shifting airfreight from major metropolitan airports to regional airports in Australia, proposing an optimization approach. Results show that subsidies can reduce total costs, with non-linear subsidies performing better economically and in delivery time, while linear subsidies are more suitable for reducing cargo traffic at major metropolitan airports.
The major metropolitan airports in Australia have become increasingly congested, resulting in substantial increases in operational costs and waiting time at these airports. This paper assesses the effectiveness of subsidy programs in shifting airfreight from metropolitan airports to regional airports assuming the vehicle routing problem approach is used to optimise the downstream (i.e., road) logistics. We analyse the freight distribution network structure and logistics decisions under two (government) subsidy scenarios. We develop a mixed integer linear programming model incorporating the time-window and release-time constraints. A case study in Australia is used to illustrate the application of the proposed framework. The results show that introducing subsidies can effectively reduce the total costs from the prospective of industries involved in the airfreight distribution. The subsidy program under a non-linear subsidy provides a better performance from the economic and delivery time perspectives. However, if the primary goal is to reduce the volume of cargo traffic at the metropolitan airport, a linear subsidy program is preferred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available