4.5 Article

New insights on thioredoxins (Trxs) and glutaredoxins (Grxs) by in silico amino acid sequence, phylogenetic and comparative structural analyses in organisms of three domains of life

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10776

Keywords

Glutathione; Oxidoreductase; Thioredoxins; Glutaredoxins; Phylogeny; 3D structure comparison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a comparative analysis of the structure and amino acid sequences of 65 Trxs and 88 Grxs from 12 organisms in three domains of life. The results showed that despite the diversity in amino acid composition, both Trxs and Grxs conserved functionally and structurally important residues. Substitutions during evolution preferred amino acids with similar chemical properties. Trxs and Grxs showed greater differences in eukaryotes compared to prokaryotes, with opposite surface charges but uncharged active sites. The study also supported the endosymbiotic origins of chloroplast and mitochondria.
Thioredoxins (Trxs) and Glutaredoxins (Grxs) regulate several cellular processes by controlling the redox state of their target proteins. Trxs and Grxs belong to thioredoxin superfamily and possess characteristic Trx/Grx fold. Several phylogenetic, biochemical and structural studies have contributed to our overall understanding of Trxs and Grxs. However, comparative study of closely related Trxs and Grxs in organisms of all domains of life was missing. Here, we conducted in silico comparative structural analysis combined with amino acid sequence and phylogenetic analyses of 65 Trxs and 88 Grxs from 12 organisms of three domains of life to get insights into evolutionary and structural relationship of two proteins. Outcomes suggested that despite diversity in their amino acids composition in distantly related organisms, both Trxs and Grxs strictly conserved functionally and structurally important residues. Also, position of these residues was highly conserved in all studied Trxs and Grxs. Notably, if any substitution occurred during evolution, preference was given to amino acids having similar chemical properties. Trxs and Grxs were found more different in eukaryotes than prokaryotes due to altered helical conformation. The surface of Trxs was negatively charged, while Grxs surface was positively charged, however, the active site was constituted by uncharged amino acids in both proteins. Also, phylogenetic analysis of Trxs and Grxs in three domains of life supported endosymbiotic origins of chloroplast and mitochondria, and suggested their usefulness in molecular systematics. We also report previously unknown catalytic motifs of two proteins, and discuss in detail about effect of abovementioned parameters on overall structural and functional diversity of Trxs and Grxs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available