4.6 Review

Making agency theory work for supply chain relationships: a systematic review across four disciplines

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-12-2021-0757

Keywords

Agency theory; Information asymmetry; Supply chain relationships; Buyer-supplier relationships; Systematic literature review

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [316020]
  2. Finnish Foundation for Economic Education [16-8806]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [316020, 316020] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews agency theory and examines the connection between governance mechanisms and supply chain relationship types. The study uses a systematic literature review to categorize governance mechanisms and create a typology of agency relationships in supply chains. The research also identifies future research directions and practical implications.
Purpose Contemporary supply chain relationships inherently rely on delegation of work between organizations and, thus, are subject to agency problems for which a wide range of governance mechanisms exist. This review of agency theory (AT), across four distinct fields, explains the connection between governance mechanisms and supply chain relationship types. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) of articles using AT in a supply chain context from the operations and supply chain management, general management, marketing, and economics fields. Findings The authors categorize the governance mechanisms identified to create a typology of agency relationships in supply chains. Research limitations/implications The developed typology provides parsimonious theory on different forms of supply chain agency relationships and takes a step towards a supply chain-oriented agency theory explaining and predicting relationship types and governance in supply chains. Furthermore, a future research agenda calls for more accurate measuring of agency costs, to examine residual gains alongside residual losses, to take a dual-sided perspective of agency relations and to adopt AT to examine more complex supply networks. Practical implications The review provides a menu of governance mechanisms and describes situations under which these mechanisms could be deployed to guide managers when developing their supply chain relationships. Originality/value The first review to combine and elaborate views from four major disciplines using AT as a lens to supply chain relationships. Expanding the traditional set of governance mechanisms provides academics and practitioners with a bigger menu of options to consider.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available