4.4 Article

Heterosexual Oral and Anal Sex: Perceptions, Terminologies, and Attitudes of Younger and Older Adults in Ibadan, Nigeria

Journal

ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 161-175

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02313-8

Keywords

Oral sex; Anal sex; Sexual behavior; Nigeria; Sub-Saharan Africa; Sexual scripts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study explored heterosexual oral and anal sex behaviors in West Africa. It found that younger adults and female sex workers were more informed about these behaviors, with sexually explicit movies being the most cited source of information. The study also identified six different scripts used by participants in discussing these behaviors.
Although heterosexual oral and anal sexual behaviors have been reported in sub-Saharan Africa, little is known about how they are understood and perceived, particularly, in West Africa. We undertook a qualitative exploration of local terminologies and sexual scripts associated with heterosexual oral and anal sex in preparation for a quantitative survey. We held focus group discussions (18) and interviews (44) with younger and middle-aged men and women from the general population and female sex workers (FSWs) in selected communities in Ibadan. Most participants had heard of oral and anal sex. Younger adults aged 18-25 years, particularly male participants and FSWs, appeared more informed than older adults in the general population. Sexually explicit movies were the most cited source of information. Oral and anal sexual behaviors were considered sensitive, with different local names, meanings, and interpretations. Participants advised against the use of slang terms in research. We identified six different scripts employed by participants in discussing oral and anal sex practices: protecting sexual relationship, financial reward, an alternative to vaginal sex, pleasure, male dominance and control, and risk, stigma, and disgust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available