Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.RELEASING THE TRAP: A METHOD TO REDUCE INATTENTION BIAS IN SURVEY DATA WITH APPLICATION TO US BEER TAXES
Trey Malone et al.
ECONOMIC INQUIRY (2019)
Consumer preferences for organic labels in Germany using the example of apple's - Combining choice-based conjoint analysis and eye-tracking measurements
Stephan G. H. Meyerding et al.
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (2018)
Multinomial Logit Models with Continuous and Discrete Individual Heterogeneity in R: The gmnl Package
Mauricio Sarrias et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2017)
Lost in the crowd? Using eye-tracking to investigate the effect of complexity on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments
Jean Spinks et al.
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING (2016)
Eye Tracking Reveals Processes That Enable Conjoint Choices to Become Increasingly Efficient with Practice
Martin Meiner et al.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2016)
Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?
Kennet Uggeldahl et al.
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING (2016)
Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments
Danny Campbell et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION (2015)
VISUAL ATTENTION AND ATTRIBUTE ATTENDANCE IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
Kelvin Balcombe et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS (2015)
Learning and Fatigue Effects Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Accounting for Unobservable Preference and Scale Heterogeneity
Mikolaj Czajkowski et al.
LAND ECONOMICS (2014)
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies
Brett Day et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2012)
How Many Choice Sets and Alternatives are Optimal? Consistency in Choice Experiments
Chanjin Chung et al.
AGRIBUSINESS (2011)
Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models
William H. Greene et al.
TRANSPORTATION (2010)
The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity
Denzil G. Fiebig et al.
MARKETING SCIENCE (2010)
Eye-tracking information processing in choice-based conjoint analysis
Martin Meissner et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH (2010)
Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: A comparison of online and mail survey modes
Scott J. Savage et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS (2008)
Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates
S Caussade et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2005)
Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions
GL Poe et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2005)
Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency
JR DeShazo et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2002)
Share Paper
