4.5 Review

Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: A systematic literature review

Journal

TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800

Keywords

Teacher self -efficacy; Inclusive education; Inclusive education practices; Inclusive pedagogy; Primary school; Secondary school; In-service teachers; Pre-service teachers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that self-efficacy beliefs related to inclusive education have a positive impact on teaching practices and students. This study examines how teacher self-efficacy has been measured and the factors influencing the perceived self-efficacy of teachers in inclusive schools. A systematic literature search identified 71 studies on teacher self-efficacy in inclusive education practices. Analysis finds that teaching experience, teaching context, knowledge of inclusive education policies, confidence in teaching in inclusive classrooms, pre-service teacher education, professional learning, and experiential contact with people with disability all play influential roles in teacher self-efficacy.
Research illustrates that self-efficacy beliefs related to inclusive education impact teaching practices and could positively impact on students. This study explores how teacher self-efficacy has been measured and the factors that influence the perceived self-efficacy of teachers within inclusive schools. A systematic search for literature examining teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education practices yielded 71 studies for review. Analysis revealed that teaching experience and teaching context impacted selfefficacy. Knowledge of inclusive education policies elevated the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers. Confidence in teaching in inclusive classrooms, pre-service teacher education, professional learning and experiential contact with people with disability were also influential. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available