Columbus' egg and the engineer's effect in forecasting solutions adoption

Why is it that both complex and simple solutions that have proved to be effective have low rates of adoption? The literature on innovation (i.e., a specific category of solutions) management has provided some clues, identifying barriers of several types: organizational, technological, economic, human behavior and the nature of the inno-vation. We suggest that one reason is the misalignment between the degrees of complexity i.e., the degree of knowledge embedded, of the problem and its solution. A solution perceived to be too simple for a complex problem falls into the category of what might be called Columbus' egg. At the basis of this effect there is the tendency to minimize expected frustration as the difference between the effort made in looking for a solution and the obtained reward. When the solution is too complex for a simple problem, this is the case of the Engineer's effect. This effect has its cognitive underpinnings in the tendency to minimize decision-making costs. We discuss and illustrate these phenomena and propose some guidelines for technology developers and product innovation managers, as well as for forecasting solutions adoption.

Automated summary

Both complex and simple solutions have low rates of adoption, potentially due to a misalignment between the complexity of the problem and the simplicity of the solution. When a solution is perceived as too simple for a complex problem or too complex for a simple problem, it may be less likely to be adopted.