4.7 Article

The implications of sugarcane contract farming on land rights, labor, and food security in the Bunyoro sub-region, Uganda

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106326

Keywords

Sugarcane farming; Contract farming; Land rights; Labor regimes; Food security; Livelihoods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides insights into the commercialization process of smallholder agriculture through sugarcane contract farming in Uganda's Bunyoro sub-region. The findings highlight the adverse effects of the wave of contract farming schemes around sugar, which integrate rural farmers into unequal contractual relations and expand the agro-extractivist search for cheap land and labor, rather than promoting inclusive rural development.
Over the years, the Ugandan government had been promoting agricultural commercialization to become a middle-income economy by 2020. In 2012, the president remarked that if all the 40 million acres of arable land were put to full potential, everyone would be richer. Sugarcane commercialization, in the form of contract farming, has been praised as one of the preferred instruments to promote it, leading to the emergence of large and medium sugar corporations in Uganda's countryside. The study aims to provide insights into the commer-cialization process of smallholder agriculture through sugarcane contract farming (CF) and the implications on land rights, labor relations, and rural livelihoods, taking Uganda's Bunyoro sub-region as a case. To achieve this objective, the study used a qualitative approach and carried out in-depth interviews with a total of 75 partici-pants who were directly affected by the actions of the sugar production and or participated in the CF scheme (as outgrowers) as well as factory officials. The findings highlight that the wave of CF schemes around sugar, which was engineered by a convergence of power and interest between the Ugandan state and Indian capital in-vestments, adversely integrates rural farmers into sugar commodity production networks amidst unequal contractual relations, expanding agro-extractivist search for cheap land and labor rather than bringing inclusive rural development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available