4.7 Article

Kolmogorov complexity metrics in assessing L2 proficiency: An information-theoretic approach

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024147

Keywords

linguistic complexity; L2 writing; learner corpus; language assessment; syntactic complexity; morphological complexity; language proficiency; information theory

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China
  2. [17BYY115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on 774 argumentative writings by Chinese EFL learners, this study examined the ability of Kolmogorov complexity to distinguish different proficiency levels. The results showed that Kolmogorov overall and syntactic complexity were effective in distinguishing proficiency levels, while other metrics were not. Furthermore, Kolmogorov syntactic complexity had weak or no correlation with fine-grained syntactic complexity metrics, suggesting they may address different linguistic features and can complement each other in predicting proficiency levels.
Based on 774 argumentative writings produced by Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) learners, this study examined the extent to which Kolmogorov complexity metrics can distinguish the proficiency levels of beginner, lower-intermediate, and upper-intermediate second language (L2) English learners. Kolmogorov complexity metric is a holistic information-theoretic approach, which measures three facets of linguistic complexity, i.e., overall, syntactic, and morphological complexity simultaneously. To assess its validity in distinguishing L2 proficiency, Kolmogorov complexity metric is compared with traditional syntactic and morphological complexity metrics as well as fine-grained syntactic complexity metrics. Results showed that Kolmogorov overall and syntactic complexity could significantly distinguish any adjacent pair of L2 levels, serving as the best separators explored in the present study. Neither Kolmogorov morphological complexity nor other complexity metrics at both the syntactic and morphological levels can distinguish between all pairs of adjacent levels. Results of correlation analysis showed that Kolmogorov syntactic complexity was not or weakly correlated with all the fine-grained syntactic complexity metrics, indicating that they may address distinct linguistic features and can complement each other to better predict different proficiency levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available