Journal
LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000769
Keywords
lupus nephritis; outcome assessment; health care; epidemiology
Categories
Funding
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the National Institutes of Health [AR076612]
- Lupus Foundation of America research grant
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to improve the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using machine learning approaches and identify other risk factors. By comparing different algorithms, it was found that some machine learning methods and LASSO performed better in predicting APO. However, further research is needed to discover new biomarkers and risk factors for better prediction.
Objectives Nearly 20% of pregnancies in patients with SLE result in an adverse pregnancy outcome (APO). We previously developed an APO prediction model using logistic regression and data from Predictors of pRegnancy Outcome: bioMarkers In Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PROMISSE), a large multicentre study of pregnant women with mild/moderate SLE and/or antiphospholipid antibodies. Our goal was to determine whether machine learning (ML) approaches improve APO prediction and identify other risk factors. Methods The PROMISSE data included 41 predictors from 385 subjects; 18.4% had APO (preterm delivery due to placental insufficiency/pre-eclampsia, fetal/neonatal death, fetal growth restriction). Logistic regression with stepwise selection (LR-S), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), support vector machines (SVM-RBF), gradient boosting (GB) and SuperLearner (SL) were compared by cross-validated area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration. Results Previously identified APO risk factors, antihypertensive medication use, low platelets, SLE disease activity and lupus anticoagulant (LAC), were confirmed as important with each algorithm. LASSO additionally revealed potential interactions between LAC and anticardiolipin IgG, among others. SL performed the best (AUC=0.78), but was statistically indistinguishable from LASSO, SVM-RBF and RF (AUC=0.77 for all). LR-S, NN and GB had worse AUC (0.71-0.74) and calibration scores. Conclusions We predicted APO with reasonable accuracy using variables routinely assessed prior to the 12th week of pregnancy. LASSO and some ML methods performed better than a standard logistic regression approach. Substantial improvement in APO prediction will likely be realised, not with increasingly complex algorithms but by the discovery of new biomarkers and APO risk factors.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available