4.8 Article

Pairing-free certificateless blind signature scheme for smart grid

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.10.012

Keywords

Smart grid; Certificateless blind signature; Batch verification; Elliptic curve discrete logarithm; Random oracle model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new certificateless blind signature scheme and an improved power request system model to protect users' privacy in the smart grid, addressing the issue of malicious attacks.
The smart grid is an emerging power system that can realize the information exchange between users and power companies in two-way communication and adjust power companies' power supply according to the real-time power requests from smart meters on the users' side. However, since malicious attackers can eavesdrop on two-way communication to collect and transmit information, they may leak users' information. Therefore, this paper proposes a new certificateless blind signature (CLBS) scheme with batch verification function and improves a power request system model for the smart grid to protect users' privacy. In addition, the proposed CLBS scheme simplifies the certificate management process in the traditional public key cryptosystem and eliminates the hidden key escrow in the identity-based public key cryptosystem. The unforgeability of the scheme is proved through the random oracle model, and the scheme's security can be reduced to the intractability of the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP). The analysis results show that our scheme does not use the time-consuming bilinear pairing operation, and has obvious advantages in computing performance compared with the existing signature schemes. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available