4.5 Article

Psychometric properties of the Korean adaptation of the communities advancing resilience toolkit (CART) assessment survey

Journal

NURSING OPEN
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 591-602

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1325

Keywords

assessment; community; disaster planning; resilience; risk management

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to adapt the CART assessment survey for Korean communities and evaluate the psychometric properties of K-CART. The results showed that K-CART had good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, and construct validity.
Aims: This study aimed to establish a cross-cultural adaptation of the Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART) assessment survey for Korean communities (K-CART) and evaluated its psychometric properties of K-CART. Design: A cross-sectional study design was used. Methods: A forward and backward translation of the CART was conducted. The psychometric properties of K-CART were evaluated with test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity and construct validity. A field study was conducted involving 315 older adults in Pohang city, South Korea from January to March, 2019. Two versions of K-CART were analysed, based on the four-factor and the expanded five-factor K-CART. Results: The test-retest reliability and internal consistency were acceptable (intraclass consistency coefficient = .90). The consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). The content validity index (CVI) was found to be acceptable; wherein the item-CVI and scale-CVI were both 0.95. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the construct validity of the expanded K-CART with five factors reached a more acceptable model fit (chi(2)/df = 2.27, CFI = 0.89, TLI = 0.86, RMESA = 0.05).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available