4.2 Article

What matters in mental health care? A co-design approach to developing clinical supervision tools for practitioner competency development

Journal

GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 491-498

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2022.53

Keywords

Clinical supervision; competency-based supervision; humanitarian settings; mental health; mhGAP; task-sharing

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Department of MSF France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Specialized mental health care providers are scarce in low resource and humanitarian settings, making it essential to provide mental health training and supervision to general healthcare workers. Developing a standardized clinical supervision tool can greatly contribute to improving the quality of mental health care worldwide.
Background. Specialised mental health (MH) care providers are often absent or scarcely available in low resource and humanitarian settings (LRHS), making MH training and supervision for general health care workers (using task-sharing approaches) essential to scaling up services and reducing the treatment gap for severe and common MH conditions. Yet, the diversity of settings, population types, and professional skills in crisis contexts complicate these efforts. A standardised, field tested instrument for clinical supervision would be a significant step towards attaining quality standards in MH care worldwide. Methods. A competency-based clinical supervision tool was designed by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) for use in LRHS. A systematic literature review informed its design and assured its focus on key clinical competencies. An initial pool of behavioural indicators was identified through a rational theoretical scale construction approach, tested through waves of simulation and reviewed by 12 MH supervisors in seven projects where MSF provides care for severe and common MH conditions. Results. Qualitative analysis yielded two sets of competency grids based on a supervisee's professional background: one for 'psychological/counselling' and another for 'psychiatric/mhGAP' practitioners. Each grid features 22-26 competencies, plus optional items for specific interventions. While the structure and content were assessed as logical by supervisors, there were concerns regarding the adequacy of the tool to field reality. Conclusions. Humanitarian settings have specific needs that require careful consideration when developing capacity-building strategies. Clinical supervision of key competencies through a standardised instrument represents an important step towards ensuring progress of clinical skills among MH practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available