Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 896-+Publisher
BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.896
Keywords
Central pancreatectomy; Distal pancreatectomy; Endocrine function; Exocrine function; Morbidity
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [82172859, 81801566, 82071867]
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC131600]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study retrospectively enrolled 296 patients who underwent CP or DP for benign and low-malignant neoplasms. The perioperative outcomes and long-term morbidity of endocrine/exocrine function were evaluated.
BACKGROUND For tumors in the neck and body of the pancreas, distal pancreatectomy (DP) has been the standard surgical procedure for the last few decades and central pancreatectomy (CP) is an alternative surgical option. Whether CP better preserves remnant pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions after surgery remains a subject of debate. AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CP compared with DP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors in the neck and body of the pancreas. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 296 patients who underwent CP or DP for benign and low-malignant neoplasms at the same hospital between January 2016 and March 2020. Perioperative outcomes and long-term morbidity of endocrine/exocrine function were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS No significant difference was observed in overall morbidity or clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula between the two groups (P = 0.055). Delayed gastric emptying occurred more frequently in the CP group than in the DP group (29.4% vs 15.3%; P < 0.005). None of the patients in the CP group had new-onset or aggravated distal metastasis, whereas 40 patients in the DP group had endocrine function deficiency after surgery (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of diarrhea immediately after surgery, but at postoperative 12 mo, a significantly higher number of patients had diarrhea in the DP group than in the CP group (0% vs 9.5%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION CP is a generally safe procedure and is better than DP in preserving long-term pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions. Therefore, CP might be a better option for treating benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms in suitable patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available